Residuals non disclosure agreement

Trending News

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

A residuals clause is a provision in an IP agreement or non-disclosure agreement stipulating that if a party learns some general information regarding the other party’s IP while working with the other party, the party learning such information is free to use that information retained in its unaided memory in its own business, regardless of the confidentiality or non-use restrictions in the agreement.

The argument in favor of the residuals clause is that it is difficult to separate general information that you learn from each business partner from previously known information or from IP that you may be developing for someone else or internally. For example, even though a software development company may not use specific code that it writes for a client, it would be difficult for such company to separate general methods of writing code that it learns from such client from its own methods or methods that it learns from other clients.

However, even the most carefully crafted residuals clause poses risks for the disclosing party. For example, it can be difficult to prove whether something was retained in someone’s unaided memory, and the concept of what constitutes “general” information can be murky.

There are several steps you can take to minimize the risks of a residuals clause:

• ensure that the residuals clause specifically excludes any license under the discloser’s patents and copyrights;
• ensure that the clause only applies to information retained in the recipient’s unaided memory without specific or intentional memorization or reference to written or electronic information;
• ensure that the clause does not affect the prohibition on disclosure of confidential information (i.e., the recipient can use the residual information for its own internal purposes, but may not disclose the discloser’s confidential information to third parties);
• if possible, limit general information to a specific category of information (e.g., each party may use the general ideas, concepts, knowhow, and techniques relating to security software programming…);
• if you are disclosing various categories of confidential information, some of which are highly sensitive, carve out the highly sensitive information from the residuals clause; and/or
• restrict the recipient’s employees or independent contractors from working on competing projects for some period of time. This exception is often difficult to negotiate.

If you are the party disclosing confidential information, especially sensitive confidential information, the best option is to avoid the residuals clause entirely. If this is not possible, try to implement as many of the suggestions above and limit the disclosure of confidential information as much as possible.

Current Public Notices

Current Legal Analysis

More from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Upcoming Legal Education Events

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding, and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free-to-use, no-log-in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates, or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys, or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws, the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 2070 Green Bay Rd., Suite 178, Highland Park, IL 60035 Telephone (708) 357-3317 or toll-free (877) 357-3317. If you would like to contact us via email please click here.

Copyright ©2024 National Law Forum, LLC